Post by account_disabled on Jan 31, 2024 8:54:16 GMT
The request from the National Civil Aviation Agency (Anac) to suspend an injunction that prevented the start of extra charges for checking baggage was denied by the president of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (SP and MS), federal judge Cecília Marcondes. reproduction Airlines are prohibited from charging extra for checked baggage. She highlighted in the decision that there is no evidence in the request of serious harm to public order, health, safety and economy to justify suspension of the injunction by the president of the court. Highlighting that this type of decision is an exceptional measure, she said that other questions should be made through ordinary resources.
For her, only a concrete unfeasibility of the air Buy Phone Number List transport system would justify the suspension of the injunction, which does not occur in this case. With the TRF-3 decisions, the minimum checked baggage allowances remain in force: 23 kg on domestic flights, and two 32 kg bags on international flights. Article 13 of Anac Resolution 400 provided for the end of franchises and the possibility of charging additional amounts for the shipment of suitcases and other items from this Tuesday (14/3). The suspension of paragraph 2 of article 14 of the resolution is also maintained, which allows airlines to reduce the maximum weight allowed for hand luggage, currently defined at 10 kg. This change could occur “for reasons of safety or aircraft capacity”.
Without specifying the criteria for this restriction, the text authorized companies to adopt the measure arbitrarily. He federal judge highlights that the agency cannot “issue a resolution that ignores this duty of the State, whose effectiveness presumes the existence of standards that guarantee the consumer a minimum of rights that do not depend on the good intentions of suppliers or service providers”. “In courts with cumulative jurisdiction, the most unusual actions, which deal with more difficult issues, end up being poorly managed and, normally, these actions have a very large social impact.
For her, only a concrete unfeasibility of the air Buy Phone Number List transport system would justify the suspension of the injunction, which does not occur in this case. With the TRF-3 decisions, the minimum checked baggage allowances remain in force: 23 kg on domestic flights, and two 32 kg bags on international flights. Article 13 of Anac Resolution 400 provided for the end of franchises and the possibility of charging additional amounts for the shipment of suitcases and other items from this Tuesday (14/3). The suspension of paragraph 2 of article 14 of the resolution is also maintained, which allows airlines to reduce the maximum weight allowed for hand luggage, currently defined at 10 kg. This change could occur “for reasons of safety or aircraft capacity”.
Without specifying the criteria for this restriction, the text authorized companies to adopt the measure arbitrarily. He federal judge highlights that the agency cannot “issue a resolution that ignores this duty of the State, whose effectiveness presumes the existence of standards that guarantee the consumer a minimum of rights that do not depend on the good intentions of suppliers or service providers”. “In courts with cumulative jurisdiction, the most unusual actions, which deal with more difficult issues, end up being poorly managed and, normally, these actions have a very large social impact.